women speaking in Latter-day Saint General Conference and bathroom breaks for men
Picture of April Young-Bennett
April Young-Bennett
April Young-Bennett is the author of the Ask a Suffragist book series and host of the Religious Feminism Podcast. Learn more about April at aprilyoungb.com.

Women Speaking at General Conference and Bathroom Breaks for Men

When I was a missionary, I watched General Conference of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) at a church with other missionaries, most of whom were male, and was shocked to realize that male missionaries saw the very scarce women’s talks as bathroom breaks. 

Until then, I had always watched General Conference at home, either alone or with my family or with female roommates. My mission was my first experience watching a General Conference broadcast at a church building, and my first time seeing adult men stand up and excuse themselves when the only woman speaker of the session arose to speak.  

After our most recent General Conference, Exponent guest writer Leah Steelman pointed out that two of the three women speakers seemed to encourage this male bathroom break behavior by announcing in the first line of their talk that they were directing their message to specific demographics of church members that excluded adult men—children in one case and youth in the other. Only three of 35 speakers were women, and two of those women explicitly told men, “You don’t have to listen to me!”

Women Speaking at General Conference and Bathroom Breaks for Men general conference
This guy’s ready for a lady talk at General Conference!

I see where these female General Conference speakers are coming from. Of course the Young Women presidency wants to speak to youth and the Primary presidency wants to address children! That makes sense. Those are the demographics in their stewardships. The problem is that there are too few women speakers to begin with. If a couple of the 32 male speakers decided to address their remarks to a specific demographic, there would still be many more of them left to speak to the rest of us. Not so for women.

In fact, one of those 32 male speakers at the last General Conference did just that! Elder Steven R. Bangerter announced in the first line of his talk that he was directing his remarks specifically to youth, just like Sister Andrea Muñoz Spannaus did after him. (See guys? You didn’t have to hold it clear until Sister Spannaus’s turn! You could have taken your potty break early!) That still left 31 General Conference talks by men that included adult men in the intended audience, compared to only one talk by a woman.

We need General Conference talks that address the unique needs of specific demographics in the church, and with about 35 talks delivered at each General Conference, we certainly have ample time to direct some of these sermons toward certain demographics instead of trying to make every talk about everyone. And the women leaders who serve in presidencies with stewardship specifically over children or youth or women are uniquely qualified to address the needs of these particular demographic groups in their talks.

But we also need men to listen to women. We need men to hear women, and learn from women, and respect women. We need men seated in their chairs, pondering women’s words and insights, gleaning gospel truths from their sermons, feeling challenged by their perspectives and inspired by their teachings.

We need men to hold it until the rest hymn.

How can we have both? How can we make space for one or two or even more women to address their talks to specific demographic groups that may exclude adult men, while still having other talks by women directed to adult men or to the church as a whole?

The answer is simple. We need more women speaking in General Conference.

April Young-Bennett is the author of the Ask a Suffragist book series and host of the Religious Feminism Podcast. Learn more about April at aprilyoungb.com.

2 Responses

  1. This is a confusing topic for me because it isn’t discussed much at church. For example, we once had a gospel doctrine teacher tell us about apostasy during our reading of Alma the Younger. In that lesson, he informed us that apostasy is publicly speaking out or teaching contrary to priesthood authority. A woman asked if speaking out against the RS General President would be apostasy, and was told no. So the women leaders are fair game for public criticism? I was left reeling. Bishop refused to comment.

    So if we aren’t required to sustain the sister general presidencies, then why are we asked to give them sustaining votes? And if their word isn’t binding on the brethren, is it binding on just the women and children, or not binding to any of us?

    I have yet to meet the leader who could or would answer these questions, so I remain confused about it. Your article is the closest thing to an answer I have found. Maybe by addressing youth specifically, she is staying within the parameters of her authority by making her counsel applicable only for teens? Or is it all moot and she has no actual authority because she is a woman?

    1. Your comment intrigues me so i went searching for a definition of apostasy. After poking around, I feel like your gospel doctrine teacher has a very narrow definition of apostasy that he either made up or he heard from someone else that made it up. Apostasy is actively turning away. Speaking up isn’t apostasy.

      See this definition which is in line with a lot of other ones I read:
      Apostasy, the total rejection of Christianity by a baptized person who, having at one time professed the Christian faith, publicly rejects it. It is distinguished from heresy, which is limited to the rejection of one or more Christian doctrines by one who maintains an overall adherence to Jesus Christ.
      https://www.britannica.com/topic/apostasy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Our Comment Policy

  • No ads or plugs.
  • No four-letter words that wouldn’t be allowed on television.
  • No mudslinging: Stating disagreement is fine — even strong disagreement, but no personal attacks or name calling. No personal insults.
  • Try to stick with your personal experiences, ideas, and interpretations. This is not the place to question another’s personal righteousness, to call people to repentance, or to disrespectfully refute people’s personal religious beliefs.
  • No sockpuppetry. You may not post a variety of comments under different monikers.

Note: Comments that include hyperlinks will be held in the moderation queue for approval (to filter out obvious spam). Comments with email addresses may also be held in the moderation queue.

Write for Us

We want to hear your perspective! Write for Exponent II Blog by submitting a post here.

Support Mormon Feminism

Our blog content is always free, but our hosting fees are not. Please support us.

related Blog posts

Blogger April Young-Bennett lists three reasons church leaders might be choosing to enforce a strict garment-wearing mandate, even if garments may not be effective at reminding people of Jesus Christ and their covenants.
Guest author Leah Steelman shares her insights on the blog today about choosing general conference talks for her ward's Relief Society lessons. It's been widely noted that only three women spoke in last conference - but did you also notice that two of them directed their comments at the children and youth - not the adult membership? Women don't only speak less, the men are given implied permission not even to listen to those who do. Check out her great insights on the blog today!

Never miss A blog post

Sign up and be the first to be alerted when new blog posts go live!

Loading

* We will never sell your email address, and you can unsubscribe at any time (not that you’ll want to).​