Updated Relief Society Declaration

Old RS Declaration (click to enlarge)

New RS Declaration (click to enlarge)

The lds.org website changed this last week, with an update to the Relief Society Declaration.  Obviously a lot has been cut, it’s much shorter. Let’s see the differences between the old and new versions, and what was deemed to be important enough to keep.

What’s missing?

  • For starters, the implied reference to God being more than only masculine in gender in the first line.
  • The declaration no longer mentions charity, which pointed us towards our motto: Charity Never Faileth.
  • Following the promptings of the Holy Ghost, directly recommending prayer and scripture study.
  • Marriage is not mentioned in the new declaration, leaving families and homes to cover that idea.
  • Motherhood is no longer required to be ennobling, and womanhood is not expected to be inherently joyful.
  • The phrase about loving life and learning.
  • Standing for truth and righteousness. No more linking to the YW motto.
  • Sustaining the priesthood as the authority of God on the earth.
  • More than an oblique mention of temples (no need to rejoice), now referring only to covenants and ordinances.
  • Understanding our divine destiny.

What stayed?

  • Heavily referencing our duty and aspiration of becoming more like our Saviour, Jesus Christ.
  • Being unified and united in our purpose of serving others of God’s children.
  • Faith is recognised as the core of our journey in life and the gospel.
  • Directing our priorities towards eternal life and exaltation.
  • Strengthening homes and families.

What was added?

  • Individuals are identified as also needing to be supported and strengthened.
  • The Atonement is mentioned specifically, drawing attention to the primacy of its importance in our lives.

I like the way that the new declaration makes fewer prescriptive statements about what we as women will experience by virtue of being members of the church. It’s not necessary to enjoy the temple to be obedient to our covenants. Yes, life is better when we love it, but when we don’t, we don’t lose our eternal blessings, and we’re not less a part of Relief Society. I miss the connection between Young Women and Relief Society with removing the “stand for truth and righteousness” phrase, and I wonder if they’ll change “strengthen homes and families” in the young women theme to “strengthen individuals, families and homes”, to help the transition between the two auxiliaries feel more comfortable and make Relief Society more familiar.

I hope that we reference this new declaration a lot more than we did the old one. There’s less specificity in the new document, but that can be an advantage. It keeps the importance of unity and service, and elevates the importance of the Saviour and His atonement. Focussing on this as our purpose, and allowing women to create a locally relevant curriculum and projects that meet the needs of the communities in which they live.

The increase of focus on individuals seems encouraging, especially if it leads to more discussion of women as people rather than the roles they fill. It’s almost too much to hope for, but I look forward to the General Women’s Session of Conference, and I kind of expect them to base the talks around this theme. It’s possible that the changes were made too recently, especially because they didn’t hold the change back to reveal the new declaration and poster at conference, but I hope they wanted us to have a chance to ponder and process the changes as part of our preparation for listening to the words of the General Relief Society Presidency.

It’s not the Declaration that I would write, but stripped back to basics, and with the new additions, it feels more broadly applicable to our worldwide sisterhood.

Did you have a special affinity for the old Relief Society Declaration? What do you think of the new one?

Read more posts in this blog series:

17 Responses

  1. I have a bookmark from 2011 with “Relief Society Purposes” on it. There are 3:

    Increase faith and personal righteousness
    Strengthen families and homes
    Seek out and help those in need.

    I like that one. I use it to mark my place in the book I read over the phone with my grandson most nights. He reads a few paragraphs, then I read however many he read, & then he reads again.

    1. Whoops! Slightly embarrassing, but thank you for the information, Marivene.

      I love that idea, reading aloud is so cosy and special, and that bookmark is kind of fitting when you’re meeting at least two of the purposes then 🙂

      Do you think you’ll switch to the new bookmark?

      1. Easy to get the two confused, but the Relief Society Declaration is NOT the same as the Relief Society Purpose. They are separate and different.

        President Nelson referenced BOTH in his talk “Sisters’ Participation in the Gathering of Israel” given October 2018:

        “I urge you to study the current Relief Society purpose statement. It is inspiring. It may guide you in developing your own purpose statement for your own life. I also entreat you to savor the truths in the Relief Society declaration published almost 20 years ago. (Footnote to this: For the Relief Society declaration, see Mary Ellen Smoot, “Rejoice, Daughters of Zion,” Ensign, Nov. 1999, 92–94)
        https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/2018/10/sisters-participation-in-the-gathering-of-israel?lang=eng

        The Relief Society Declaration was written by the Relief Society General Presidency and given by Mary Ellen Smoot in General Conference in October 1999 and has not changed (“Rejoice, Daughters of Zion,” Ensign, Nov 1999, 92-94).
        https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/1999/10/rejoice-daughters-of-zion?lang=eng

        The CURRENT Relief Society Purpose statement was updated by the Relief Society General Presidency as announced March 10, 1017 in the Church News.
        https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/church/news/sister-burton-announces-updates-to-lds-relief-society-purpose-statement?lang=eng

  2. The RS Declaration was introduced in 1999 by Sister Smoot. It was replaced with the Three Purposes of Relief Society during Julie Beck’s presidency. The recent changes by the current RS Presidency are to the Three Purposes, not the Declaration. The current changes actually ADDED verbiage – to the beginning statement and each of the purposes. I like the additions they’ve made.

    1. Ah hah! Thank you, Chris. I’ll blame my youth for not recalling the earlier replacement of the RS Declaration with the Three Purposes.

      I really like the additional focus on unity and individuals, too.

      1. Yes, you’re right… you are delightfully young and I’m exceeding my expectations in the age area. ( almost old???) Just happened to be in the Stake RS presidency when the Declaration came out. It was a parallel document to the Proclamation on the Family. The Declaration has faded, while the Proclamation lives on and on.

  3. Thanks for this post, olea! Very interesting. I do wish they had used God in the three purposes statement, instead of Heavenly Father. God leaves open room for Heavenly Mother.

    1. Yes, or even being slightly more explicit and referring to Heavenly Parents in the stated purposes of a program aimed at women.

  4. And, referring to the previous three purposes statement that Chris mentioned above — I think I like the old one better. If one of the purposes of RS is to strengthen home and families, I prefer to leave it at that, as opposed to adding on that bit about ordinances and covenants. Seems to me there are plenty of ways to strengthen homes that that have nothing to do with ordinances. Maybe I’m just being grumpy right now. But honestly don’t see the advantages of the added verbiage in the revised statement of purpose.

  5. I’m very glad they added the word “individuals” to the second purpose. Individuals as in – each woman. And individuals as in – women without a spouse or children. It shows recognition that every person is important, and that each of us exists even without marriage and children. It validates our various circumstances. It’s nice (and quite unusual) to be so prominently included.

    1. Yes, I agree completely. Individuals and unity cover the various relationships we enter into, in families and friendship groups and professional settings.

  6. The Relief Society Declaration is not the same as the Relief Society Purpose. The Purpose Statement was updated in March of 2017. You compared the Declaration with the new Purpose. They didn’t leave anything out. The Declaration is still the same. You should fix your article.

  7. I know this is old but this post came up in a search on who wrote the relief society declaration. Anyone have any info on who writes these mission statements for women? I hope it’s actually women, but even then I have a sneaking suspicion it would still be subject to a man’s approval.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Our Comment Policy

  • No ads or plugs.
  • No four-letter words that wouldn’t be allowed on television.
  • No mudslinging: Stating disagreement is fine — even strong disagreement, but no personal attacks or name calling. No personal insults.
  • Try to stick with your personal experiences, ideas, and interpretations. This is not the place to question another’s personal righteousness, to call people to repentance, or to disrespectfully refute people’s personal religious beliefs.
  • No sockpuppetry. You may not post a variety of comments under different monikers.

Note: Comments that include hyperlinks will be held in the moderation queue for approval (to filter out obvious spam). Comments with email addresses may also be held in the moderation queue.

Write for Us

We want to hear your perspective! Write for Exponent II Blog by submitting a post here.

Support Mormon Feminism

Our blog content is always free, but our hosting fees are not. Please support us.

related Blog posts

I cried and cried and cried. I wanted to brush it off as some old white guy that I didn't have to listen to. But I knew that the real problem in my mind wasn’t really about that man. It was that I was choosing to raise my children in a community where it is okay to be openly racist but not socially acceptable to be anti-racist.
In honor of Disability Employment Awareness Month, blogger Nicole Sbitani writes how it's so frustrating to see people with disabilities in the church continually framed as needing a cure or only needing to be ministered to, when in fact people with disabilities have always and will always be an important part of the community whose contributions are essential. Here are just a few of their stories - do you know any more?

Never miss A blog post

Sign up and be the first to be alerted when new blog posts go live!

Loading

* We will never sell your email address, and you can unsubscribe at any time (not that you’ll want to).​