Last week was Thanksgiving and in many LDS homes around the US, you might have seen people going around the table and discussing the things they are grateful for. Sometimes this is voluntary, sometimes it’s obligatory. In my home, it was both.
What struck me this year was my children’s responses. Since January, my kids have gone through their parents’ divorce and separation, their mom’s diagnosis of a brain tumor which amounted to multiple hospital stays, and their dad’s job loss. For all accounts and purposes, this was an exceptionally difficult year. So while my kids had plenty to say about gratitude, they also had plenty to say about all of the hard things in their lives and it struck me how important it is for them to have space for both.
There is plenty of sturdy research that extols the virtues of gratitude. Gratitude has been shown to improve things like psychological functioning, physical health, relationships, and even career development. Aligned with the research, gratitude is a cornerstone of Latter-day Saint teachings, often praised as a virtue that can transform lives, deepen faith, and provide strength during trials. But while gratitude has the potential to uplift and heal, I have seen in my own life and in the lives of others how the push for gratitude can easily fall into emotional bypassing. This tendency becomes even more pronounced in discussions around the experiences of women within the church, where societal and cultural expectations of gratitude can intersect with gendered patterns of emotional labor and self-sacrifice.
What is Emotional Bypassing?
Emotional bypassing happens when individuals use spiritual or emotional practices—such as gratitude—to sidestep or suppress negative emotions, rather than processing and resolving them. This can look like using gratitude to dismiss feelings of pain, grief, or frustration by focusing solely on the blessings in your life. While counting blessings can be a helpful exercise, it can also prevent someone from fully engaging with the complexities of emotional or spiritual struggles.
For women, this dynamic often interacts with broader cultural expectations of nurturing, caregiving, and selflessness. LDS women are frequently encouraged to “choose joy,” serve others tirelessly, and focus on gratitude as a way to manage the stressors of their many responsibilities. While these principles are intended to seem empowering, they can inadvertently reinforce patterns where women feel pressured to ignore their own needs or silence their valid frustrations.
The Gendered Pressure to “Choose Joy”
In the church, gratitude is sometimes presented as a remedy for every emotional challenge, but the pressure to “choose joy” often falls disproportionately on women. Here’s some examples I’ve seen:
- In motherhood: Mothers navigating exhaustion or postpartum depression may feel pressure to be “grateful” for their trials because motherhood is their most “divine role.” This might prevent them from having space to discuss their challenges or seek professional help.
- In leadership or service: Women in demanding callings may feel unable to voice feelings of overwhelm for fear of being seen as ungrateful or not up to the task.
- In discussions of equality: Women expressing concerns about gender inequities in church roles or policies might be told that they need to be more grateful for their roles. This response can dismiss their concerns, implying that gratitude should override a desire for progress or change.
These well-meaning but dismissive responses reflect a broader cultural pattern where women’s voices are softened, their struggles minimized, and their resilience assumed.
Gratitude, Authenticity, and Empowerment
Gratitude should never be a weapon used to silence valid emotions or concerns, especially for women who may already carry a heavy burden of emotional labor within their families, communities, and church. Instead, gratitude can coexist with the full spectrum of human experience, including anger, grief, doubt, and the pursuit of change.
As women, the best way to ensure gratitude serves as a source of strength rather than a form of bypassing is by:
- Honoring Emotions: When other women express pain or frustration, validate their feelings without rushing to reframe the narrative with gratitude. A mother overwhelmed by caregiving responsibilities or a woman grappling with systemic inequities needs empathy, not a lecture on blessings.
- Acknowledging Intersectionality: Women’s experiences in the church are diverse, and shaped by race, class, marital status, and more. Gratitude should not be weaponized to diminish the unique struggles faced by women in different circumstances.
- Embracing Advocacy as Gratitude: Advocating for change within the church or broader society can be an act of gratitude. By seeking to make the community more inclusive and equitable, women honor the blessings they’ve received by ensuring others can enjoy them too.
- Modeling Self-Compassion: Practice gratitude toward yourself—not just for your circumstances. Gratitude for your own strength, wisdom, and efforts can counteract the cultural narrative that a woman’s value lies solely in serving others.
Ultimately, gratitude can’t be beneficial unless it leaves space for a wide spectrum of experiences and emotions. Using gratitude to bypass difficult emotions is like drinking diet soda when you’re hungry. It might taste good and even fill you up for a while, but it can’t have healthy long-term effects because it’s not what your body is actually asking for. This is even more important for women who are consistently being handed Diet Coke and then told to “just be grateful for what they have” when they say they are still hungry. Be grateful for the good things, be sad/ angry/ upset about the bad things. There is enough space around the table for all of it.
5 Responses
As a man, i who has grown up in the church, I find this very interesting.
Let me start with Nathan’s feelings towards the UK having a female Prime Minister. I was 13, and an ordained Deacon, living in the UK at the time Mrs Thatcher became Prime Minister. She had been leader of the opposition for five years at that point. I confess I was not very political during that time. But from her becoming Prime Minister, I was. She remained in that position until I has been married for five years and my wife and I had had our first three children. Never, at any point, did I think it strange that she was Prime Minister. Nothing I had ever learned, or was learning, at church gave me pause to think she should not be the Prime Minister.
I mentioned being ordained Deacon at the time, essentially with “power and authority”. But I didn’t think like that at the time. My Mother way outranked me, and when in my parents’ home she still does.
Yes, it is true that there are callings that a woman cannot hold. There are callings a man can’t also. Primary kids love me, but I will never be the Primary president – and that is very definitely church policy.
The problem with the idea of women holding priesthood callings isn’t that the church doesn’t allow it, it is that the callings require the hold to be a priesthood holder. And so far as I can see, God does not allow this. I think that there are callings which women do not hold that they could – and are not really priesthood linked. Exec Sec, Clerks, Sunday School presidency.
I have never felt that I woman could not be a Bishop, Stake President, GA or Apostle. I am sure many could serve as well, if not better, than many men. I have personally had some useless bishops – my current one isn’t great. And, even though two of his own daughters are in YW, with his son still in Primary, he favours the YM budget – and uses the YW one for joint activities (one of my daughters is the YWP).
I have my own thoughts and feelings, not relevant to this discussion, on whether women should receive the priesthood. But that they don’t, and as such do not serve in certain callings, has never made me think they are not capable of leading. I have seen them lead, in many ways, very well.
I replied to the wrong thread – sorry.
Whoa. This piece articulates observations I’ve had recently about the trickiness of being grateful during grief. Thank you. I particularly appreciate the four ways to ensure we are using gratitude as a source of strength. I also enjoyed the metaphor of the diet soda. I’m going to use this to teach my kids.
When I was a young teen, I remember my grandma giving me advice to “count my every blessing” when I was unhappy. But then, a memory of someone telling her to do that and her resenting it came back, and she kind of apologized. I think she was recognizing what you are teaching here, that she was asking me to repress my pain, something she knew didn’t work as someone who faced mental illness. There are a lot of good points here. I really like the point that we can benefit from expressing gratitude and love toward ourselves in hard times. I feel for what your family has gone through the past year.
This is why I love Kate Bowler and can’t stop buying her books. She finds a way to honor the disappointments in life and somehow retain faith. Her book Everything Happens For a Reason (And Other Lies I’ve Loved) tells her story and has some really great practical advice at the end about what you CAN do and say that is actually helpful when you want to provide support to friends and loved ones. And I love The Lives We Actually Have, and Have A Beautiful, Terrible Day – they both contain blessings or poems/meditations that help you connect to those in mourning in such a meaningful way. Without using platitudes and toxic positivity. I find that when I friend is experiencing difficulty, I can always find words from Kate Bowler to share that fit the moment. I would love for someone to give a talk before Thanksgiving that uses all of her material!