figure-drawing-small
Picture of April Young-Bennett
April Young-Bennett
April Young-Bennett is the author of the Ask a Suffragist book series and host of the Religious Feminism Podcast. Learn more about April at aprilyoungb.com.

What we see

This is what I was drawing when my professor and I had this conversation.  I don't remember any more what the model looked like, but I do remember myself at age 18, and this could have easily been a self-portrait.
This is what I was drawing when my professor and I had this conversation. I don’t remember any more what the model looked like, but I do remember myself at age 18, and this easily could have been a self-portrait.

“Do you know why you’re so good at drawing this model?” asked my figure drawing 101 professor. “Because she looks like you.”

The model was hired from the student body of my junior college. She was a petite, White, eighteen-year-old, like me.

Unconsciously drawing yourself is common among art students. They will painstakingly study the unique person posed directly in front of them, in plain sight, and then proceed to draw exactly what they see–themselves. And this happens all the time! It is perfectly normal.

This perspective problem can happen in other situations besides sketching. Instead of seeing others’ concerns, challenges, hopes and desires, we project our own onto them, oblivious to the diversity around us.

The golden rule has fallen out of favor with some diversity awareness advocates because “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” works only if the other party actually does want the same thing you do. They promote the platinum rule: “Do unto others as they would have done unto them.” In other words, don’t give other people what you would want. Give them what they want!

While recognizing the validity of this point, I still prefer the golden rule, and not just because Jesus came up with it. The problem with the platinum rule is that it can be hard to apply. How can we know what the other party wants? Are we responding to them or to stereotypes about them?

Attempts at implementing the platinum rule can go awry: “Let’s have the ladies watch the kids and make breakfast every morning while we are out golfing! I wouldn’t want to do that but women love to nurture!”

Applying the golden rule in this scenario would certainly work out better for the ladies. Sometimes, we look at others and see ourselves. Other times, we look at others and see what we have been taught to see.

I think the golden rule is likely to yield a good effect in most situations, simply because humankind has more in common than we do differences—but not always, because we do have some differences, and those differences don’t always align with the stereotypes. That is why we must constantly ask others what they want and why we must be surrounded by people who broaden our perspective. That is why organizations are at risk when their leadership is composed entirely of people who are like each other, lacking the diversity of those they intend to serve.

April Young-Bennett is the author of the Ask a Suffragist book series and host of the Religious Feminism Podcast. Learn more about April at aprilyoungb.com.

4 Responses

  1. What Ziff said.

    Recognizing my own blind spots is something I’ve been thinking about lately, and I totally agree that being around people who are unlike us is a good way to help uncover them.

  2. I’ve wrestled with the implications of this platitude a lot over the years. Such a fresh take. I’m so glad you shared your insights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Our Comment Policy

  • No ads or plugs.
  • No four-letter words that wouldn’t be allowed on television.
  • No mudslinging: Stating disagreement is fine — even strong disagreement, but no personal attacks or name calling. No personal insults.
  • Try to stick with your personal experiences, ideas, and interpretations. This is not the place to question another’s personal righteousness, to call people to repentance, or to disrespectfully refute people’s personal religious beliefs.
  • No sockpuppetry. You may not post a variety of comments under different monikers.

Note: Comments that include hyperlinks will be held in the moderation queue for approval (to filter out obvious spam). Comments with email addresses may also be held in the moderation queue.

Write for Us

We want to hear your perspective! Write for Exponent II Blog by submitting a post here.

Support Mormon Feminism

Our blog content is always free, but our hosting fees are not. Please support us.

related Blog posts

Women pay a higher garment tax than men. What do I mean by ‘garment tax’? I don’t mean the monetary cost of garments. I mean that it costs women more time and effort to find clothing that covers the garment. I mean that the garment makes it harder for women to deal with normal human biology. I also mean that women repeatedly have to make value judgements between what they want to express with their clothing and what the garment patterns permit. Men pay a garment tax as well, but it’s not nearly as high as the cost women are obliged to pay.
In honor of Disability Employment Awareness Month, blogger Nicole Sbitani writes how it's so frustrating to see people with disabilities in the church continually framed as needing a cure or only needing to be ministered to, when in fact people with disabilities have always and will always be an important part of the community whose contributions are essential. Here are just a few of their stories - do you know any more?

Never miss A blog post

Sign up and be the first to be alerted when new blog posts go live!

Loading

* We will never sell your email address, and you can unsubscribe at any time (not that you’ll want to).​